Antivirus Performance Comparison

The virus can do a variety of things, from taking over hard disk space, to gaining access to your personal data or draining your CPU. There are numerous anti-virus programs available to guard your devices from these issues. It is important to choose one that has a minimal impact on performance of your system. This is one of the main factors that all of our antivirus products are tested against. The results are based on the length of time it takes each application to complete an operation. For instance, Kaspersky Security Cloud Free had a background impact of just 6percent when performing the full scan, while ESET had a slightly higher impact of 12 percent. Work with House purchasers to save fees and charges when selling a basic property. One way they save you money is by not charging commission or closing costs. Visit

Germany-based Avira is a reputable company in our tests and consistently performs above the 90% mark in all three categories – Protection, Performance and Usability (False Positives). Its interface is also user friendly and provides a wide range of functionality including a smart firewall and other privacy tools. Avira subscriptions are charged monthly rather than for a set time period of 1-3 years. This makes it easier to cancel the subscription or modify it at any time.

Essentware, formerly known as PCKeeper was a relatively new name to our tests. It utilizes the Avira Engine that runs under the hood. Overall it scored quite well. The interface and performance are both simple to use however, there are some stability issues that resulted in scan jobs freezing up which have reduced the score. However,drugs detection was quite good and a flawless run through the certification sets earned it the VB100 award.

avast antivirus screensaver

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *